<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do we market artistry without losing the art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/</link>
	<description>Contemporary Dance</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Otis Houston Jr Has A Posse - The Winger</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Houston Jr Has A Posse - The Winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-2586</guid>
		<description>[...] around what we see in the artist, not only what he does but who he is.  The talk on Great Dance and DTW misses something else too.  The grand narrative that surrounds the production and performance of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around what we see in the artist, not only what he does but who he is.  The talk on Great Dance and DTW misses something else too.  The grand narrative that surrounds the production and performance of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WNYC - ART.CULT &#187; I went to the theater, and all I got was this lousy bobblehead doll&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>WNYC - ART.CULT &#187; I went to the theater, and all I got was this lousy bobblehead doll&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>[...] The folks at Dance Theater Workshop are having an interesting conversation about this on their blog; As Megan Sprenger wrote in the discussion&#8217;s opening editorial, &#8220;There must be a better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The folks at Dance Theater Workshop are having an interesting conversation about this on their blog; As Megan Sprenger wrote in the discussion&#8217;s opening editorial, &#8220;There must be a better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>This is a great step toward addressing a very important issue. Having recently relocated to Texas after living and working as performer in New York City for almost eight years, I've found myself in an environment where arts education and arts appreciation is lacking. The exposure to dance is very limited and the audience even more so. 

As an educator I find that it's important to not just teach the "how" but also how to "communicate" what's behind the movement. In Texas where football rules all, the questions are "Why should I care about dance, how does it affect me?" "What is modern anyway?" "I went to that other show last time and I didn't like it" These are all statements that I've heard. 

Marketing departments are calling other performers asking how to market a show for people such as Savion Glover....WHAT!!! In this situation I definitely think that the marketing department is falling short. The other extreme being the independent artist performing in front of an audience in a forum that has been designed to experiment and test new works and have live feedback from the audience, and the artist not being able to articulate the meaning or story behind the piece, any type of intention or even process of creating. This is definitely where the artist falls short. 

I think that this initiative is necessary and I hope that the two worlds ca work together. If they can it will truly be a win-win for everyone, especially those that would rather watch reality tv than experience "real" performance and all it has to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great step toward addressing a very important issue. Having recently relocated to Texas after living and working as performer in New York City for almost eight years, I&#8217;ve found myself in an environment where arts education and arts appreciation is lacking. The exposure to dance is very limited and the audience even more so. </p>
<p>As an educator I find that it&#8217;s important to not just teach the &#8220;how&#8221; but also how to &#8220;communicate&#8221; what&#8217;s behind the movement. In Texas where football rules all, the questions are &#8220;Why should I care about dance, how does it affect me?&#8221; &#8220;What is modern anyway?&#8221; &#8220;I went to that other show last time and I didn&#8217;t like it&#8221; These are all statements that I&#8217;ve heard. </p>
<p>Marketing departments are calling other performers asking how to market a show for people such as Savion Glover&#8230;.WHAT!!! In this situation I definitely think that the marketing department is falling short. The other extreme being the independent artist performing in front of an audience in a forum that has been designed to experiment and test new works and have live feedback from the audience, and the artist not being able to articulate the meaning or story behind the piece, any type of intention or even process of creating. This is definitely where the artist falls short. </p>
<p>I think that this initiative is necessary and I hope that the two worlds ca work together. If they can it will truly be a win-win for everyone, especially those that would rather watch reality tv than experience &#8220;real&#8221; performance and all it has to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Maneca</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Maneca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that a multi-faceted approach is required here. Putting videos on YouTube (or the like) should be but one component of a marketing strategy. 

If our goal is to entice new people to attend dance concerts... then... how we describe our work, what our videos look like on YouTube, how great our postcards are designed... is irrelevant if we keep sending our marketing tools to the same people over and over and over again.

We need to explore the "general" population to find those who are likely to see dance.

The YouTube initiatives described above are great first steps at gathering lists of potential dance-goers ... however, these seem to be "individual" approaches to this mission.

As a community, we need more. 

We need a larger initiative. One that cultivates long-term relationships with potential dance-goers. 

This has to be a community effort in order for it to work. Individual artists and companies are too "self-focused" (as they should be) to undertake such a large mission. We need a centralized community organization to take on the initiative and share the resulting lists and strategies.

Lastly ... yes, I would be interested in joining a focus group to discuss these ideas.

Peace,
Fernando</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that a multi-faceted approach is required here. Putting videos on YouTube (or the like) should be but one component of a marketing strategy. </p>
<p>If our goal is to entice new people to attend dance concerts&#8230; then&#8230; how we describe our work, what our videos look like on YouTube, how great our postcards are designed&#8230; is irrelevant if we keep sending our marketing tools to the same people over and over and over again.</p>
<p>We need to explore the &#8220;general&#8221; population to find those who are likely to see dance.</p>
<p>The YouTube initiatives described above are great first steps at gathering lists of potential dance-goers &#8230; however, these seem to be &#8220;individual&#8221; approaches to this mission.</p>
<p>As a community, we need more. </p>
<p>We need a larger initiative. One that cultivates long-term relationships with potential dance-goers. </p>
<p>This has to be a community effort in order for it to work. Individual artists and companies are too &#8220;self-focused&#8221; (as they should be) to undertake such a large mission. We need a centralized community organization to take on the initiative and share the resulting lists and strategies.</p>
<p>Lastly &#8230; yes, I would be interested in joining a focus group to discuss these ideas.</p>
<p>Peace,<br />
Fernando</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>So many great thoughts above that it's difficult to know where to start, but...

Megan, great idea to have gathering to continue discussion of these and related ideas.

Kevin, following-up your thoughts about art marketing and integrity: One of opportunities, I believe, with better quality online dance videos is that the video itself can play a much greater part in the marketing -- this means that the actual work of an artists is speaking for itself to a much larger degree than ever before. The old adage in marketing is sell the sizzle  not the steak. On the Internet there's no reason that the steak cannot speak for itself -- apologies to the vegetarians :), but I do think that the online medium does change how we think of marketing and communication. And we don't always have to focus on the intangibles when we can highlight the creative work and explorations.

Karl, the testimonial approach your recommend, if I can call it that, can be very effective. On the websites for dance companies I never really see what Karl is recommending. Often there are quotes from dance critics praising the company. But I think it would be very helpful for us to explore different, effective approaches to including a range of viewer experiences (text or video) that will be compelling to people who are considering going to dance performances.

Sarah, I'm going to try to spend time at your series of posts this week in which you explain your concept of hypermedia - I'm very interested to learn what ideas you are exploring and what you're recommending.

Christopher, it strikes me that nobody has really done a systematic analysis of what works and doesn't work in terms of online dance videos, especially when considered as marketing tools to cultivate new and larger audiences. And how, as you mention, do you convey some fairly abstract notions?

Marc, your imaginary description of an indecipherable, esoteric dance company description reminds of of Mel Brook's History of the World Part I's famous line of a standup comic describing his occupation: "I coalesce the vapors of human expression into a viable and expresable form." (I'm a bit off, but something like that).

There's definitely a need, especially on the Internet, for dance companies to explore new approaches to writing about their companies and their specific works.

I'm very interested in seeing what"discovery mechanisms" you create that will help online dance viewers locate videos that they will find of interest. And the same goes for the geo-targeting tools you are developing. As things stand now, there is no service one could go to that would answer the question. "Show me all dance videos of dance companies that will be performing in a specified city in the month of July."

Finally, I agree with Marc that many dance companies are not putting enough care into how they upload, describe and tag their videos. Videos will not be found if not enough time is taken to properly configure the video's profile information.

Jessica, there's definitely need for artists to promote themselves, however much some do not care at all for this process. But, I think that good news is that there are some false dichotomies floating around. I don't really accept notion that there has to be a conflict between being authentic and being accessible.  Or that marketing by definition is selling out. If done properly as I mention above, dancers can speak directly through their art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many great thoughts above that it&#8217;s difficult to know where to start, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Megan, great idea to have gathering to continue discussion of these and related ideas.</p>
<p>Kevin, following-up your thoughts about art marketing and integrity: One of opportunities, I believe, with better quality online dance videos is that the video itself can play a much greater part in the marketing &#8212; this means that the actual work of an artists is speaking for itself to a much larger degree than ever before. The old adage in marketing is sell the sizzle  not the steak. On the Internet there&#8217;s no reason that the steak cannot speak for itself &#8212; apologies to the vegetarians :), but I do think that the online medium does change how we think of marketing and communication. And we don&#8217;t always have to focus on the intangibles when we can highlight the creative work and explorations.</p>
<p>Karl, the testimonial approach your recommend, if I can call it that, can be very effective. On the websites for dance companies I never really see what Karl is recommending. Often there are quotes from dance critics praising the company. But I think it would be very helpful for us to explore different, effective approaches to including a range of viewer experiences (text or video) that will be compelling to people who are considering going to dance performances.</p>
<p>Sarah, I&#8217;m going to try to spend time at your series of posts this week in which you explain your concept of hypermedia - I&#8217;m very interested to learn what ideas you are exploring and what you&#8217;re recommending.</p>
<p>Christopher, it strikes me that nobody has really done a systematic analysis of what works and doesn&#8217;t work in terms of online dance videos, especially when considered as marketing tools to cultivate new and larger audiences. And how, as you mention, do you convey some fairly abstract notions?</p>
<p>Marc, your imaginary description of an indecipherable, esoteric dance company description reminds of of Mel Brook&#8217;s History of the World Part I&#8217;s famous line of a standup comic describing his occupation: &#8220;I coalesce the vapors of human expression into a viable and expresable form.&#8221; (I&#8217;m a bit off, but something like that).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s definitely a need, especially on the Internet, for dance companies to explore new approaches to writing about their companies and their specific works.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very interested in seeing what&#8221;discovery mechanisms&#8221; you create that will help online dance viewers locate videos that they will find of interest. And the same goes for the geo-targeting tools you are developing. As things stand now, there is no service one could go to that would answer the question. &#8220;Show me all dance videos of dance companies that will be performing in a specified city in the month of July.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, I agree with Marc that many dance companies are not putting enough care into how they upload, describe and tag their videos. Videos will not be found if not enough time is taken to properly configure the video&#8217;s profile information.</p>
<p>Jessica, there&#8217;s definitely need for artists to promote themselves, however much some do not care at all for this process. But, I think that good news is that there are some false dichotomies floating around. I don&#8217;t really accept notion that there has to be a conflict between being authentic and being accessible.  Or that marketing by definition is selling out. If done properly as I mention above, dancers can speak directly through their art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CULTURIST &#187; I went to the theater, and all I got was this lousy bobblehead doll&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>CULTURIST &#187; I went to the theater, and all I got was this lousy bobblehead doll&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>[...] The folks at Dance Theater Workshop are having an interesting conversation about this on their blog; As Megan Sprenger wrote in the discussion&#8217;s opening editorial, &#8220;There must be a better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The folks at Dance Theater Workshop are having an interesting conversation about this on their blog; As Megan Sprenger wrote in the discussion&#8217;s opening editorial, &#8220;There must be a better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Danser</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Danser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Karl Cronin, your insightful quote (“The man of knowledge... etc") hit on the head what I was thinking throughout reading this. I think that many strategies of marketing outlined here are intelligent, and I think one of the main problems we face as artists in NYC is that there are seemingly infinite opportunities for entertainment, and building an audience when one has only a small budget for advertising is difficult in a city where certain high budget events are advertised to death. And that we continue to fill a house at all in the age of TV shows which enable people to see virtuosic, if not often enough artistic, dance without leaving their couches, is no small feat. All that being said, the overwhelming vibe I get from many others in the field is that being accesible to an audience (and god forbid, maybe an arts-ignorant audience) is unnecessary or compromising, and I think this attitude does us all a huge disservice. If we want to fill seats, we can't only preach to the choir. We have to get outside the studios and look at the reality of the MANY communities we live among, if not in, in the city. And we have to realize that any show might be someone's first dance experience, and how sad if that experience were so opaque it turned out to be their last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl Cronin, your insightful quote (“The man of knowledge&#8230; etc&#8221;) hit on the head what I was thinking throughout reading this. I think that many strategies of marketing outlined here are intelligent, and I think one of the main problems we face as artists in NYC is that there are seemingly infinite opportunities for entertainment, and building an audience when one has only a small budget for advertising is difficult in a city where certain high budget events are advertised to death. And that we continue to fill a house at all in the age of TV shows which enable people to see virtuosic, if not often enough artistic, dance without leaving their couches, is no small feat. All that being said, the overwhelming vibe I get from many others in the field is that being accesible to an audience (and god forbid, maybe an arts-ignorant audience) is unnecessary or compromising, and I think this attitude does us all a huge disservice. If we want to fill seats, we can&#8217;t only preach to the choir. We have to get outside the studios and look at the reality of the MANY communities we live among, if not in, in the city. And we have to realize that any show might be someone&#8217;s first dance experience, and how sad if that experience were so opaque it turned out to be their last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Kirschner</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Kirschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Having looked at some of the above posts, I think it should be reassuring to some that many of the theoretical questions asked above do have real and practical answers and these capabilities will be part of the TenduTV platform. Some thoughts:

Fernando: you had raised the issue of geographical targeting. Through our partners, we will be able to recognize/target viewers in a particular geographic area (I'm not sure off the top of my head exactly how granular we'll get, but definitely on a state-by-state basis), and inform them of upcoming performances in their area.

Karl: You're right about YouTube and the video quality issues. Somewhere within the dance-tech forums I posted some basic thoughts on this issue, including a few (of the many valid) reason why the industry has been a bit slow on the uptake. To your second point, yes, many choreographers are executives, but from an outsider's point of view, many of the choreographers who are executives tend to be significantly less effective at both roles. There are exceptions, but not many.

Your quote is particularly relevant as well. There are a few company descriptions that can be found online where the work or company's mission is described in such patently absurd language that it's almost comical. If a dance company describes their work as "transcending the ephemeral boundaries of the fluidly effervescing human condition as the spirit travels across the planes of time and space" they need some serious communications help.

(PS, the above description doesn't really exist, although I'm sure we've all seen something much too close)

Megan: You nailed the issue of video right on the head when you said "it's about getting that video out to a greater mass." There is a general (and patently false belief), that posting something on YouTube is reaching the greater mass. Doug had asked my thoughts last week one of the videos on YouTube that he felt should have found a greater audience than it did. In this case, the choreographer never gave it a chance to find a larger audience, due to outright horrible metatagging that prevented a potential audience member from having any chance of stumbling over the video without looking specifically for it. We're putting a significant amount of effort into enhancing "discovery mechanisms" that will bring the incremental viewer to the artform, rather than trying to continually upsell the same audience member whose attention every company seems to be competing over.

Finally, as far as the integrity of the work is concerned, everyone should make the work that they want to make. You may not have the largest audience, but at the least we like to think that we can help you reach the audience does exist.

Cheers,

Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having looked at some of the above posts, I think it should be reassuring to some that many of the theoretical questions asked above do have real and practical answers and these capabilities will be part of the TenduTV platform. Some thoughts:</p>
<p>Fernando: you had raised the issue of geographical targeting. Through our partners, we will be able to recognize/target viewers in a particular geographic area (I&#8217;m not sure off the top of my head exactly how granular we&#8217;ll get, but definitely on a state-by-state basis), and inform them of upcoming performances in their area.</p>
<p>Karl: You&#8217;re right about YouTube and the video quality issues. Somewhere within the dance-tech forums I posted some basic thoughts on this issue, including a few (of the many valid) reason why the industry has been a bit slow on the uptake. To your second point, yes, many choreographers are executives, but from an outsider&#8217;s point of view, many of the choreographers who are executives tend to be significantly less effective at both roles. There are exceptions, but not many.</p>
<p>Your quote is particularly relevant as well. There are a few company descriptions that can be found online where the work or company&#8217;s mission is described in such patently absurd language that it&#8217;s almost comical. If a dance company describes their work as &#8220;transcending the ephemeral boundaries of the fluidly effervescing human condition as the spirit travels across the planes of time and space&#8221; they need some serious communications help.</p>
<p>(PS, the above description doesn&#8217;t really exist, although I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ve all seen something much too close)</p>
<p>Megan: You nailed the issue of video right on the head when you said &#8220;it&#8217;s about getting that video out to a greater mass.&#8221; There is a general (and patently false belief), that posting something on YouTube is reaching the greater mass. Doug had asked my thoughts last week one of the videos on YouTube that he felt should have found a greater audience than it did. In this case, the choreographer never gave it a chance to find a larger audience, due to outright horrible metatagging that prevented a potential audience member from having any chance of stumbling over the video without looking specifically for it. We&#8217;re putting a significant amount of effort into enhancing &#8220;discovery mechanisms&#8221; that will bring the incremental viewer to the artform, rather than trying to continually upsell the same audience member whose attention every company seems to be competing over.</p>
<p>Finally, as far as the integrity of the work is concerned, everyone should make the work that they want to make. You may not have the largest audience, but at the least we like to think that we can help you reach the audience does exist.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Pelham</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Pelham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>I agree that video promotion seems to hold the most potential for communicating what a dance work will be like, for pulling in new audiences and for reassuring them that the work will, indeed, hopefully be enjoyable. But I'm not sure it will work in all cases.

Is anyone afraid that putting video online will spoil the surprise for the audience? I have also known some choreographers to be wary that someone might copy them.   Then again, people go to see Hello, Dolly! over and over and over...again, even though they know exactly what's coming.

How do we make enticing videos or video commercials for work that is about, for instance, the elongation of time? that are thoughtful but not, perhaps, "catchy"? Or how does one represent improv? In a video the "content" (for lack of a better word) can so easily overwhelm the sensitivity of the performers and the of connection between performers that gives rise to the content. And that content may never be repeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that video promotion seems to hold the most potential for communicating what a dance work will be like, for pulling in new audiences and for reassuring them that the work will, indeed, hopefully be enjoyable. But I&#8217;m not sure it will work in all cases.</p>
<p>Is anyone afraid that putting video online will spoil the surprise for the audience? I have also known some choreographers to be wary that someone might copy them.   Then again, people go to see Hello, Dolly! over and over and over&#8230;again, even though they know exactly what&#8217;s coming.</p>
<p>How do we make enticing videos or video commercials for work that is about, for instance, the elongation of time? that are thoughtful but not, perhaps, &#8220;catchy&#8221;? Or how does one represent improv? In a video the &#8220;content&#8221; (for lack of a better word) can so easily overwhelm the sensitivity of the performers and the of connection between performers that gives rise to the content. And that content may never be repeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Sprenger</title>
		<link>http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Sprenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancetheaterworkshop.org/blog/2008/05/30/how-do-we-market-artistry-without-losing-the-art/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Would a couple of you be interested in gathering and discussing some of the ideas above? Perhaps a focus group of sorts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a couple of you be interested in gathering and discussing some of the ideas above? Perhaps a focus group of sorts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
